I've updated the grammar to allow full flexibility for components order. Duplicates and missing mandatory components are checked also. It's ready for the release.
On 10/19/05, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ersin Er wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I've just updated ACIItem grammar to provide more flexibility as Alex > >requested here: > > > >http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRLDAP-62 > > > >What I've done is to allow any order of components for ProtectedItems > >and UserClasses. These two sequences contain lots of optional > >components. So it make sense to have them in any order. Do you think > >that we should extend this flexibility for most of the rules, even > >non-optional ones ? > > > > > Yah good point. Perhaps we should do it for all. If we prefix the > component with a name then it's basically addressed by name and position > does not matter. I think its a good idea to do all of them for consistency. > > Thanks, > Alex > > -- Ersin
