> From: Irving, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Interesting. Why not using a Thread Pool for this? > > It may easily solve this issue as threads will stay for some time and > being reused. > > If you did so, I think it would be a pool of 1: There's only ever one > worker in use at a time (AFAIK).
But that is OK, Executors have such size 1 thread pools. This may be much cheaper than creating and destroying threads. Jose Alberto
