Hi Alex,

Alex Karasulu wrote:

If there are classes people would like to use in this main module then we should break it up so there is a different artifact that is used which does not package the log4j.properties file. Let me know if anyone had this intention.


I had in mind a general scenario when I specified log4j.properties in the exclude property. I thought that it was probably healthier to keep log4j.properties file out of jars. It should probably end up in a conf or directory, or something like that, for the standalone.

With regards to the standalone configuration - I still haven't done it. I've been going through an incredibly busy period at work. I will see to it when thing quiet down (should be soon). If someone else can step in and do it I'm also happy to help in whatever way I can.

For the time being I have made sure the javaapp mega jar now includes the log4j.properties file in it.

That works.

Cheers,
Nick

Alex



--

ATLASSIAN - http://www.atlassian.com
Australia's Fastest Growing Software Company 2002-05 [BRW Magazine]


Reply via email to