RE: [MINA] MessageHandler interface

[Jose Alberto Fernandez]

Thanks for the quick fix.   Another matter around Demux, is that currently it only looks at super-interfaces if a direct match is not found, But it does not look at super-classes. This is annoying when you have protocols that extend all messages from some particular superclass and you want to be able to treat groups of messages the same way (like ignoring them).   Also, it may be interesting to see if there is a good way to cache the resolution of super-interfaces and super-classes in order to make such code more efficient. You will just need to make sure that the cache is flushed when MessageHandlers are added or removed.   Keep the good work,   Jose Alberto   From: Trustin Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 November 2005 01:11 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [MINA] MessageHandler interface   Hi Jose, 2005/10/31, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: It there any reason why org.apache.mina.protocol.handler.MessageHandler.messageReceived() does not allow throwing an Exception? I would have thought the signature should be similar to org.apache.mina.protocol.ProtocolHandler.messageReceived (). This means you need to treat error conditions differently depending if you use one implementation strategy or another. It was my mistake.  Thank you for the heads up! I checked in the fix: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-111 Thanks, Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/