Trustin Lee wrote:
I know that you mentioned commons umbrella just 'for example', but I'd
like to talk about the vision of MINA project a little bit here.
MINA is just a network application framework for now, but I don't
think it will be forever. My aim is to make MINA a full featured
network application platform which features:
[...]
So going under commons umbrella is like moving to another Directory
project IMHO because MINA won't fit well with commons eventually.
I agree, 'commons' is maybe not the best example..'Jakarta' probably is
more suited to what I meant.
My point was simply to say that it needs to be more apparent that MINA
is not really related to Directory but is a *real* project on its own,
like if you go to the Apache web page, user can see it listed without
needing to go to directory.
At the same time a TLP really is supposed to be for a very mature
project and means that whatever happens the project can auto-feed itself
which is very challenging and should remain like that.
For the records, originally, (Brett wasn't there yet but he can ask
Jason for history :), Maven was under Turbine.
The beginning though, was a bit more ...hem...frantic, but if I remember
well it started in with a [maven] tag in turbine mailing list in January
or February 2002 (maybe even december 2001) and by April it had its own
mailing list and was flooded by commits.
- Re: Yall need your own list Stephane Bailliez
-
