2005/11/22, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I mean 'our own'. Sorry for bad English!
Trustin Lee wrote:
> Why don't we use pooling techinique? We could use commons-pooling or
> our proprietary stack implementation. :)
>
What you talkin bout Willis? :) Proprietary?
I mean 'our own'. Sorry for bad English!
> 2005/11/19, Emmanuel Lecharny < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
>
>
> > >Added a brutal and rude synchronization to avoid a race
> condition in DnParser usage.
> > >
> > >At least, it corrects the problem, but the server is now 3
> times slower.
> > >
> > >
> > Darn I was enjoying the recent speed ups too. We need to figure
> this
> > one out.
>
> Well, after having tuned the log level, the penalty is not that
> awfull :
> something like 30%.
>
> I got 113 search requests per second, against 143 req/s four month
> ago.
>
> There are huge areas of optimization to work on, but from now one,
> I bet
> the first move is to finalize the 1.0 beta. We don't need a
> blazing fast
> server which is full of bugs ;)
>
+1. I think we should add features up until we get to a beta. Then we
can spend our time optimizing. Who knows what will happen to your
optimizations as new features are stacked on. We might break them I
mean and you will have spent good time on it. Then again I am enjoying
the performance boosts we have gotten from your recent work. Thanks!
Alex
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
