Does this means that the client needs to use a different serialization infrastructure than the one provided by the JDK?
It would be nice if a client using regular JDK APIs and hence encodings could talk to a highly performant MINA server. This is particularly important for small clients, RMI implementations and such. Same for the pascalStrings are they compatible with what read/writeUTF produces? Jose Alberto > From: Trustin Lee (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-126?page=all ] > > Trustin Lee closed DIRMINA-126: > ------------------------------- > > Fix Version: 0.9 > (was: 0.9.1) > Resolution: Fixed > > I used ObjectInput/OutputStream to implement this feature. > read/writeClassDescriptor() method is overridden to minimize the size of > the serialized data. > > > ByteBuffer.get/putObject() > > -------------------------- > > > > Key: DIRMINA-126 > > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-126 > > Project: Directory MINA > > Type: New Feature > > Reporter: Trustin Lee > > Assignee: Trustin Lee > > Priority: Minor > > Fix For: 0.9 > > > > > Adding get/putObject() to ByteBuffer will make protocol implementor's > life very easier. What we have to consider are the possible performance > hit and the size of the serialized data. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa > - > For more information on JIRA, see: > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
