[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSNICKERS-64?page=all ]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRSNICKERS-64:
------------------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
I don't know if this is something that is to be done, but my guess is that it's
better not to spend time on Snickers. Twix will provide the decoding sooner or
latter.
> Modify Rule.finish() so it returns an Object
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRSNICKERS-64
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSNICKERS-64
> Project: Directory ASN1
> Type: Improvement
> Components: BER Runtime
> Reporter: Alex Karasulu
> Assignee: Alex Karasulu
>
> It might be a good idea to have Rule.finish() return an object so extending
> classes can get values without having to pop() a stack. We need to figure
> out the best means to pass variables. The problem is the cleanup in the
> super.finish() will whipe away any member variables we set to pass values to
> the subclass.
> Perhaps rules can have a abstract method that can be implemented by
> suclasses. Don't know but have to do some thinking here to clean this
> garbage up!
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
