I thought many other things about DIRMINA-42:
-> A single IoAcceptor can manage (and bind/unbind) many localSocketAddress, so when we unbind only one of them we have to disconnect only the IoSessions correlated to that SocketAddress (DIRMINA-93). Because of this is good to mantain a IoSessionMap for each binded service in IoAcceptor. -> The choice between hashMap or simple collection is interesting, but many codes can be developed in the same manner, so i begun to write down some interfaces and some patches to mina9.0 code, patching the tcp packages especially.

May I send that codes on jira? I read something about the Apache License, have I to modifie the code, apply some introduction to each class?

Sorry for all that question, Niklas Therning, I hope I do not disturb you too much.

by Fedechicco



----- Original Message ----- From: "Federico Bonelli (JIRA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:34 PM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-42) SessionManagers should manage list of sessions being managed.


[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-42?page=comments#action_12360367 ]

Federico Bonelli commented on DIRMINA-42:
-----------------------------------------

Yes, I planned to work it out because I need to resolve DIRMINA-93 for my applications.

Well, I'd like to work at this, but I'm new to team-development tecnique (I always worked alone), so I need a large amount of tips, i'd like to discuss every single choice.

I was thinking about that, about the hashMap vs Collection, and I don't know. I have many structure that need of a unique identifier that match every single connection, in my applications, but for every application my key is different.

I'm thinking about an ftp server that need of couple nick-ipaddr, about a chat server that need only ipaddr before login, then the nick after login, the neededs of every application is protocol specified...

For mina purpouse only (DIRMINA-93) a collection is all we need, but if we want to make this IoSessionMap usable for the highlevel application we need to develop a userdefinable hashing, pointing to our own collection, or maybe to another parallel mina-useless data structure dedicated for user-usage (that's the goal of DIRMINA-42)

So the key problem is worse then I thougth. What do you think about it?

SessionManagers should manage list of sessions being managed.
-------------------------------------------------------------

         Key: DIRMINA-42
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-42
     Project: Directory MINA
        Type: New Feature
    Versions: 0.7
    Reporter: Trustin Lee
    Assignee: Niklas Therning
     Fix For: 0.9.1


Users are maintaining the list of managed sessions in acceptors and connectors. It will be much better if MINA can handle this.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
  http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Reply via email to