Hi Enrique, Knew you where at the conference so I expected a delayed response. Hope the conferences sessions and bofs were recorded so we can all see/hear more details one of these days.
> At first glance your use case doesn't look like it fits with Config > Admin. Config Admin is not for generic business object operations. > Rather, the typical Config Admin use case is design to "inject" > configuration information into components. The R4 Configuration Admin spec for ManagedServiceFactory and the examples in the Service Compendium sure looked like it would fit my requirement for modeling the business objects configured from LDAP objectClasses. BTW my objects do exist within a single Service component and they may in the future grow up to be registered services themselves one day;-) Even hoped to leverage directory metadata in conjunction with the MetaType service. Along these lines I also noticed that the R4 Service Compendium MetaType service (page 140-432) even gives an example using a person objectClass (OID 2.5.6.6). I looked at your sandbox configuration implementation and saw that you are using an InitialContextFactory as an OSGi bundle service for the ConfigurationAdminFactory. Would this InitialContextFactory be a more appropriate service for me to depended on (at least in the short term) and just keep my JNDI access as is? welcome back, John
