On 1/11/06, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vinod Panicker wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Wanted to checkout mina to build it, and I noticed that the directory > >trunk has been renamed to "trunks". Just wondering - why a > >non-standard approach? > > > > > Just to be clear that we have more than one project's trunk in there. > Worth the move you think?
It would have got my -1, but that doesn't matter. Humour me on this pls... Is there a clear line between what constitutes a module and a dependency? Couldnt apacheds have say mina as a dependency rather than as a module? In that case, we could have had the directory trunk and outside of it, the other projects with their respective trunks. And since directory has modules, then it still constitutes a single project IMO - so even that doesnt show a need to call trunk as "trunks" :) Regards, Vinod.
