2006/1/7, Johannes Zillmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
For now there's no way to achieve the same behavior with this. But I guess we can implement this by providing a special write request object:
IoSession session = ...;
session.write( new TransferRequest( fc, 0, 23 ) );
WDYT?
Trustin
-- Dear mina team,
currently i'm participate in 2 projects in which network communication
plays a big role.
The profile of the projects looks similar:
- there is a lot of coordination communication to do, whereat mina is great
- but a lot of large data blocks(simply call it files..) has to be moved
as well, whereat mina naturally can't beat fe a simple bio socket
implementation in performance
After testing a lot and thinking some time about it, i came to the point
that the simplest way to gain the efforts of using
mina but not loosing any piece of performance is to have the possibilty
to get direct access to a sessions socket (no matter if bio or nio).
This would avoid the overhead of chunking, filtering,... data which is
not intended to do so.
And it would allow things like
FileChannel fc;
SocketChannel sc;
fc.transferFrom(sc,0,23);
For now there's no way to achieve the same behavior with this. But I guess we can implement this by providing a special write request object:
IoSession session = ...;
session.write( new TransferRequest( fc, 0, 23 ) );
WDYT?
Trustin
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
PGP Key ID: 0x854B996C
