Peter,
> The changes look like they help simplify usage of MINA in simple
> scenarios.. the examples are certainly much simpler, but for users
> that might have a more complex integration, they seem to be somewhat
> of a step backwards
I haven't looked at the code, but having seen the dialog so far, you
certainly make a strong case for vetoing the changes until your concerns
are resolved.
Perhaps a set of convenience classes for MINA would address ease of use
without sacrificing more advanced use.
Sure. We do our best to fulfill the needs of various users as usual. This API is not a final version but a draft. The final shape we will get with MINA 1.0.0 will satisfy as many users as possible.
Thank you,
Trustin
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
PGP Key ID: 0x854B996C
