Trustin Lee wrote:
Try to replace scpexe: to scp:. It's slightly faster. BTW does anyone know why we're using scpexe instead of scp?
It seemed to be more stable across platforms.
Alex
Trustin Lee wrote:
Try to replace scpexe: to scp:. It's slightly faster. BTW does anyone know why we're using scpexe instead of scp?
It seemed to be more stable across platforms.
Alex