Hi Chris, On 2/24/06, Chris Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well Trustin, > > I think you are right that it doesn't make a huge difference. My problem > ended up being caused somewhere completely different, and had nothing to > do > with ByteBuffer or any part of MINA. :-) Anyway, I did add the clean up > to > the dispose() method, and the whole thing is working great now.
It's good to hear that you found a problem. :) I'm also curious about the new API that you proposed Trustin. Any idea where > you are with that? I'm just curious if when 1.0 comes out, is it going to > be substantially different than what we currently have in version 9? Just > curious. The new API which uses Java SPI? Users didn't like it at all and it was disposed. :D The API will evolve on and on until we release 1.0. IMHO, the current API is very concrete enough so we won't need much change. You'll be able to catch up the changes very easily as long as you stay tune on this mailing list. Thanks as always for creating MINA. Thanks for using MINA. ;) Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
