Hi, On 8/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: akarasulu Date: Sun Aug 20 22:14:20 2006 New Revision: 433152
...
--- directory/branches/apacheds/1.0/core/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/server/core/subtree/Subentry.java (added) +++ directory/branches/apacheds/1.0/core/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/server/core/subtree/Subentry.java Sun Aug 20 22:14:20 2006 @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +/* + * Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation + * + * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); + * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. + * You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + * + */ +package org.apache.directory.server.core.subtree; + + +import org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.subtree.SubtreeSpecification; + + +/** + * An operational view of a subentry within the system. + * + * @author <a href="mailto:[email protected]";>Apache Directory Project</a> + * @version $Rev$ + */ +public class Subentry +{ + static final int COLLECTIVE_SUBENTRY = 1; + static final int SCHEMA_SUBENTRY = 2; + static final int ACCESS_CONTROL_SUBENTRY = 4; + static final int AUTONOMOUS_AREA_SUBENTRY = 8; + + private SubtreeSpecification ss; + private int type; + + + final void setSubtreeSpecification( SubtreeSpecification ss ) + { + this.ss = ss; + } + + + final SubtreeSpecification getSubtreeSpecification() + { + return ss; + } + + + final void setTypes( int type ) + { + this.type = type; + } + + + final int getTypes() + { + return type; + } + + + final boolean isCollectiveSubentry() + { + return ( COLLECTIVE_SUBENTRY & type ) == COLLECTIVE_SUBENTRY; + } + + + final boolean isSchemaSubentry() + { + return ( SCHEMA_SUBENTRY & type ) == SCHEMA_SUBENTRY; + } + + + final boolean isAccessControlSubentry() + { + return ( ACCESS_CONTROL_SUBENTRY & type ) == ACCESS_CONTROL_SUBENTRY; + } + + + final boolean isAutonomousAreaSubentry() + { + return ( AUTONOMOUS_AREA_SUBENTRY & type ) == AUTONOMOUS_AREA_SUBENTRY; + } +}
Alex, We might also need accessControlScheme information associated with access control subenries. So having a full object model might be better here for future needs. I mean seperate classes for subentry types. Cheers, -- Ersin
