[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-600?page=all ]
Emmanuel Lecharny closed DIRSERVER-600.
---------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Has been modified and fixed a while ago !
> Improvment in the way DN are treated
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRSERVER-600
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-600
> Project: Directory ApacheDS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
>
> We have mesured that DN parsing is the hot spot in the server : we spend
> around 80 % of server time to parse DNs.
> After having studied the way BindRequest does handle DN, we can say that for
> a single bind for the user "uid=admin,ou=system", we have more than 40
> parsing done. Here is a list of all the parsing in the DnComparator.compare()
> method :
> (The '*' in front of each line shows where a parsing of both DN is done)
> * Compare 'ou=groups,ou=system' and 'uid=admin,ou=system'
> * Compare 'prefnodename=sysPrefRoot,ou=system' and 'uid=admin,ou=system'
> Compare 'uid=admin,ou=system' and 'uid=admin,ou=system'
> Compare 'uid=admin,ou=system' and 'uid=admin,ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=groups,ou=system' and 'uid=admin,ou=system'
> * Compare 'prefnodename=sysPrefRoot,ou=system' and 'uid=admin,ou=system'
> Compare 'uid=admin,ou=system' and 'uid=admin,ou=system'
> Compare 'uid=admin,ou=system' and 'uid=admin,ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=groups,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=interceptors,ou=configuration,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=configuration,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> Compare 'ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> Compare 'ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=groups,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=interceptors,ou=configuration,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=configuration,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> Compare 'ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> Compare 'ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=groups,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=interceptors,ou=configuration,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=configuration,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> Compare 'ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> Compare 'ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=groups,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=interceptors,ou=configuration,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=configuration,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> Compare 'ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> Compare 'ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=groups,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=interceptors,ou=configuration,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> * Compare 'ou=configuration,ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> Compare 'ou=system' and 'ou=system'
> If we can change this compare function to work with Name instead of String we
> could have a huge improvment : more that 35x faster
> (I wrote a micro-bench to mesure the difference : around 36 times faster).
> As this is not the single place where we can gain time (we have a lot or
> String -> DN and DN -> String conversions during the Bind process), we would
> be able to handle Bind Request much much faster, too (being aware that we
> have a lot of other costly operaions that will nor allow a x40 improvment).
> My personnal guess is that we should be able to handle around 5000 binds per
> second against the current 300, but this is just a guess :)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
