Ersin Er a écrit :
Yes, I understood you intent. But I think LdapDN can also be an
interface extending Name. So we can clearly see what it adds to Name.
LdapDN is and will continue to implement Name. But as it will become an
interface, it will 'extends' - instead of 'implement' - Name interface :)
On 9/3/06, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ersin Er a écrit :
> Sorry, let me correct my sentence:
>
> I prefer interfaces to classes for "compilation purposes". ;-)
Yes, me two. But my svn message wasn't very clear :) Whay I tried to
mean was : "Added a skeleton to avoid compilation errors" ...
However, in this very case, LdapDN is really a class, but it implements
javax.naming.name interface, so I think this is OK for LdapDN to be a
class.
>
> On 9/3/06, Ersin Er <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I prefer interfaces to classes to "compilation purposes". ;-)
>>
>> On 9/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Author: elecharny
>> > Date: Sun Sep 3 05:46:30 2006
>> > New Revision: 439770
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=439770&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Added a skeleton of LdapDN message. This is for compilation
purpose.
>> >
>> > Added:
>> >
>>
directory/sandbox/akarasulu/apacheds-2.0/shared/ldap/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/name/LdapDN.java
>>
>
>
--- Begin Message ---
Ersin Er a écrit :
Yes, I understood you intent. But I think LdapDN can also be an
interface extending Name. So we can clearly see what it adds to Name.
LdapDN is and will continue to implement Name. But as it will become an
interface, it will 'extends' - instead of 'implement' - Name interface :)
On 9/3/06, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ersin Er a écrit :
> Sorry, let me correct my sentence:
>
> I prefer interfaces to classes for "compilation purposes". ;-)
Yes, me two. But my svn message wasn't very clear :) Whay I tried to
mean was : "Added a skeleton to avoid compilation errors" ...
However, in this very case, LdapDN is really a class, but it implements
javax.naming.name interface, so I think this is OK for LdapDN to be a
class.
>
> On 9/3/06, Ersin Er <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I prefer interfaces to classes to "compilation purposes". ;-)
>>
>> On 9/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Author: elecharny
>> > Date: Sun Sep 3 05:46:30 2006
>> > New Revision: 439770
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=439770&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Added a skeleton of LdapDN message. This is for compilation
purpose.
>> >
>> > Added:
>> >
>>
directory/sandbox/akarasulu/apacheds-2.0/shared/ldap/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/name/LdapDN.java
>>
>
>
--- End Message ---
begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:Emmanuel L=C3=A9charny
n;quoted-printable:L=C3=A9charny;Emmanuel
org:IKTEK
adr:;;13 rue Salomon de Rotschild;Suresnes;;92150;France
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.iktek.com
version:2.1
end:vcard
