MINA has its own mailing list. Please send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe to the list, and send your question to [email protected] from the next time.
On 10/18/06, Colin Koeck <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You will have to increase your direct buffer memory. Please refer to our FAQ page.:
http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/mina/faq.html#connection-reset
I think it might be a good idea to use heap buffers by default. What do you think, everyone?
Please let us know whenever you have any idea to improve MINA. All ideas will be appreciated.
HTH,
Trustin
-- I recently upgraded from netty2 to mina, and noticed mina is much more stable which I am very happy about. However, it seems to be a memory hog which concerns me a little. I'm trying to push about 75,000 messages, each about 400 characters in length, through a client/server architecture using mina..and the software throws a OutOfMemoryError about half-way through. The only way I got it to successfully finish was to execute the software with -Xmx1000M!
You will have to increase your direct buffer memory. Please refer to our FAQ page.:
http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/mina/faq.html#connection-reset
I think it might be a good idea to use heap buffers by default. What do you think, everyone?
I'm going to profile the software later this week, but I'm wondering if the results I got with mina are expected, and if there is any way to cut corners and use less memory with mina. I'd appreciate it if anyone has any input on the subject. Thank you.
Please let us know whenever you have any idea to improve MINA. All ideas will be appreciated.
HTH,
Trustin
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP key fingerprints:
* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
