On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 17:53 -0500, Alex Karasulu wrote: > Ok what are we moving into felix common? Four third party wrapping projects: antlr-osgi commons-collections-osgi commons-lang-osgi server-logger-osgi (The first three projects have no java sources, they only have a pom.xml, while the server-logger-osgi, adds only an OSGi Activator class for dynamic manipulation of log levels in an OSGi environment.) Few moving parts.
> And will not moving our stuff > over to felix common not make it harder for others to commit on those > sources? There will be little reason to change these once these build and deploy a valid bundle to a maven repository. They will then be available to us as well as others that may not use ADS/Mina. The commons effort at Felix is only a stopgap effort with the goal to make valid OSGi bundles from common libraries that now are not valid OSGi bundles. > Alex can > > you get with Richard Hall and create a place for the commons, and get me > > a svn userid/pw with commit access so I can redeploy our common > > dependencies to there? If necessary (from the felix community > > standpoint) I can also help with other wrapping efforts besides the few > > we need. > > Rather than get with Richard (a person) we should be asking about how to > start working the commons thing on the community's dev list. Right > Also if > you're a main driver for doing things in there you can get commit rights > which should be the case. Ditto > > > Mina > > There will open a window of opportunity for us to add OSGi wrapping > > subproject project to Mina as soon as Peter Royal creates a Java5 > > optimized Mina 1.0.0 compatible branch. Can you help facilitate the > > idea? JIRA: http//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-27 > > You already have rights to commit to the directory project which still > for now includes MINA. Don't remember seeing an email with username/password for svn. How can I obtain these? > I recommend creating a private MINA branch in > your personal sandbox area and making the appropriate changes there then > presenting this idea to the MINA dev list. > > WDYT? > > This should be more proactive and they can see just what you are > proposing first hand by investigating your branch. This is what I had in mind as well. John
