OK, I have implemented and committed it.

On 12/23/06, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ersin Er a écrit :

> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> Why is SS SC added as a binary syntax checker? It's human readable,
> isn't it?

It is, but the binary SC is just a kind of "accept all" SC. I didn't
implemented the parser for subtree specification, but just created the
handler.

>
> On 12/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:





--
Ersin

Reply via email to