OK, I have implemented and committed it. On 12/23/06, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ersin Er a écrit :> Hi Emmanuel, > > Why is SS SC added as a binary syntax checker? It's human readable, > isn't it? It is, but the binary SC is just a kind of "accept all" SC. I didn't implemented the parser for subtree specification, but just created the handler. > > On 12/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-- Ersin
