On 12/29/06, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm thinking about reorganize a little bit the developper quide for ADS,
> becuase it is spreading all over the wiki... We have pieces on :
> - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxDEV/Index
> -
>
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx10/ApacheDS+v1.0+Developers%27s+Guide
> <
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx10/ApacheDS+v1.0+Developers%27s+Guide
>
> -
>
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/ApacheDS+v1.5+Developer%27s+Guide
> - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Building+trunks
> - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Interceptors
> <http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Interceptors>
> - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Mitosis
> - http://docs.safehaus.org/display/APACHEDS/Developer%27s+Guide
> - http://docs.safehaus.org/display/APACHEDS/Home/xxxxx
>
> What about moving all those pages to
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxDEV ?


Would it not be best to keep dev specifics for a version in it's own
space?


Well, basically, a good idea. I'm not sure it makes a lot of sense to change
the 1.0 version dev doc, it's dead anyway (any volunteer to retro-document
it ? ;). So 1.5 doco should be put in 1.5 space, and generic dev doco should
be put id DIRxDEV, agreed.

Then we could use the DEV space for general non-version specific
development issues?


The problem is that we may have very few elements to put in this space. At
some point, I'm just wondering if it was a good idea to create such a space.
wdyt ?

Don't think I disagree.  I don't really know for sure and so I was
asking some devil's advocate questions.


yeah, and this is why I pushed the question on the ML, instead of doing the
reorg and waiting for acid remarks ;)

I wonder what Christine and Stephan have to say about this as well.


Good point, they certianly have a vision of what should be the correct
structure.

Regards,
Alex






--
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Reply via email to