I have added this feature in the following commits: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=493715 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=493745
Now, speficationFilter component can either be a Refinement or a Filter. On 12/21/06, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all, Currently we use an odd X.500 syntax for refinements in the subtreeSpecification grammar. Perhaps we should just use the filter syntax and allow for all attribute types in the filter as Ersin pointed out we should do. WDYT? Alex
-- Ersin
