Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
I would favor a simplification of the server.xml file, where default values are removed, and with sub-files for, say, partition. I find it a little bit complicated to handle many partition configurations in one big single xml file !

+1 this is a great idea. Break up the configuration into multiple files. Don't know if spring can do this using references to load another file.

Also how will this effect the installation and relative verses full path names to referred configuration files.

Experiments need to be done.

Now, we have some other urgent things to handle, like Schema refactoring, ugly bugs and pending releases.

100% agree on that.

I would like to postpone the server.xml refactoring for the next two months, but definitively, we need this refactoring to occurs before 1.6 version.

Yeah right now I don't have the cycles.  For me my priorities are:

Dynamic Schema
Multi Master Replication
Getting Triplesec off the ground and working on JACC stuff with David

Oh and all those darn presentations I have to do :).

Regards,
Alex


begin:vcard
fn:Alex Karasulu
n:Karasulu;Alex
org:Apache Software Foundation;Apache Directory
adr:;;1005 N. Marsh Wind Way;Ponte Vedra ;FL;32082;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Member, V.P.
tel;work:(904) 791-2766
tel;fax:(904) 808-4789
tel;home:(904) 808-4789
tel;cell:(904) 315-4901
note;quoted-printable:AIM: alexokarasulu=0D=0A=
	MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
	Yahoo!: alexkarasulu=0D=0A=
	IRC: aok=0D=0A=
	PGP ID: 1024D/4E1370F8 BBCC E8D8 8756 2D51 C3D4 014A 3662 F96F 4E13 70F8=0D=0A=
	
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://people.apache.org/~akarasulu
version:2.1
end:vcard

Reply via email to