On 1/21/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Well, I don't know to much about famillies, but I think that we might
workaround the problem of first email, second email, etc by using
attribute descriptions options :
mail;primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mail;office: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could this technique also be used for multiple attributes that are
typically grouped together? As a specific example, would you do this
with addresses, say for a shipping address vs. a secondary shipping
address?
In RFC 2596 the technique is used for language codes:
streetAddress: 1 University Street
streetAddress;lang-en: 1 University Street
streetAddress;lang-fr: 1 rue Universite
Would it make sense to handle shipping address vs. secondary shipping
address attributes (from RFC 2256: X.500 User Schema) this way?
street;home: 5 Main St.
street;work: 10 Commercial Way
... similarly for st, l, and c (state, locality, and country).
Enrique
