PAM,
<note>
What architecture is the MacOSX release for? You might want to include
the architecture (i386 vs. PPC) in the name.
</note>
BTW I will presume all installation footprints to be the same. This
review is in reference to:
http://people.apache.org/%7Epamarcelot/ldapstudio_0.6.0/LDAP_Studio_0.6.0_linux_i386.tgz
Wow this is looking much better PAM. I looked at the jars and the foot
print. It looks really good to me.
Do me a favor and also include a source distribution tarball (can be
tarball of the svn export of LS) with the set of distributables. Will
be nice to have it in the mix. For Apacheds we include the source with
the installers but we're going to need to separate them because it's
making the installer too large.
Great Job! You'll get my +1 for a release vote.
Alex
begin:vcard
fn:Alex Karasulu
n:Karasulu;Alex
org:Apache Software Foundation;Apache Directory
adr:;;1005 N. Marsh Wind Way;Ponte Vedra ;FL;32082;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Member, V.P.
tel;work:(904) 791-2766
tel;fax:(904) 808-4789
tel;home:(904) 808-4789
tel;cell:(904) 315-4901
note;quoted-printable:AIM: alexokarasulu=0D=0A=
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo!: alexkarasulu=0D=0A=
IRC: aok=0D=0A=
PGP ID: 1024D/4E1370F8 BBCC E8D8 8756 2D51 C3D4 014A 3662 F96F 4E13 70F8=0D=0A=
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://people.apache.org/~akarasulu
version:2.1
end:vcard
