Enrique Rodriguez a écrit :
On 3/11/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
It's better and more benefical to criticize something which works than a
concept on a piece of paper... However, I also tend to think that Alex
concerns about patterns are important, because it's the best solution to
share and discuss a solution. (even if I'm too old to be a pattern
guy :)
I agree, but keep in mind that there is some structure imposed by the
framework, MINA. MINA pretty much gives you 2 ways to break up
functionality in handlers: demux'ing (aka Hashed Adapter pattern) and
IoHandlerChain (aka Chain of Responsibility). I apologize for not
discussing design with the group, but really only one of the 2 MINA
constructs makes sense here.
np. By telling us that MINA impose one of the two patterns, you are
already discussing the design, and you are also narrowing the
discussion, which is good !
Enrique
