Enrique Rodriguez a écrit :
On 3/15/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah I agree with Emmanuel. Enrique let's leave the configuration as
it is
for now.
You are after all just trying to add the SASL stuff and getting
bogged down
with
configuration.
What just happened to LdapConfiguration? It seemed like an easy part
of the SASL initiative. Emmanuel brought up good points, and I'm fine
with putting the LdapConfiguration bean under
ServerStartupConfiguration.
This is the perfect place right now. We will reconsider this later, I
think, because as you said, the actual config does not help end users.
But anyway, the urgent things is SASL, not configuration refactoring.
Did this suddenly get killed?
Damn not !
Emmanuel
