Ole Ersoy a écrit :
OK - 40 characters per line huh? :-)
Sure I like them short as well.
Thanks ! This is much better like this :)
Yes - All the information will still be in ADS at runtime.
It's just that ADS's configuration could be pointed to other
configurations files as well. The criteria would
be to avoid having users enter configuration
information in multiple locations, which
is sometimes necessary, because
tooling will define it's own
configuration file.
If conf is in the server, then you will benefit from the replication
mechanism, so no need to spread files everywhere!
Anyways - I just threw it out there as something to be
aware of in case we come across more scenarios,...we'll
have some collective memory. It feels like a low priority item to me.
Yep, me too. We are just thinking about it for 2.0...
I don't really like this scenario (but this is just me). I would
favor a Ldap self-described server.
Yes - I usually like everything in one place whenever possible.
But I want to eliminate duplication of information always.
So if down the line we start running into situations where
information needs to be duplicated in multiple configuration
files I'll probably do a prototype.
Replication is the way to go : no manual duplication ;)
PS: I don't know which mail UI you are using, but it would be very
cool for us if you can :
- avoid mails with 40 chars per line (I think that almost 99,99% of
us have at least 1024x768 wide screens ... )
- avoid adding an empty line between each lines
- and avoid keeping the whole thread at the end of each mail.
I usually always put the thread at the beginning of the mail.
I wonder if Thunderbird is doing something funky...
It always starts me at the bottom and I have to scroll to the top.
not a big deal. May be are you sending mails using HTML or some fancy
decorator ?
If you see any more where the Thread is at the end of the mail,
send it to me and I'll see what's up. Thanks.
This message is ok. You just kept the necessary bits of information
needed to follow the thread, discarding all the boring text we all have
in previous mails :)
Thanks !
Emmanuel
