Alex, Emmanuel,
Thanks for all the clarification :-) I'll make sure it makes
it into the terminology section so that we capture it.
Cheers,
-Ole
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Alex Karasulu a écrit :
Emmanuel is correct here since JNDI is far from being consistent about
LDAP.
Keep in mind that RDN *should* have been exactly what Alex said it was,
ie a *relative* (to a context) name, so 'x=a, y=b' sounds like a natural
candidate for a RDN. This is puzzling that it's not the case ... It
would have been better to use ATAVs for RDN, RDN for what it seems to
be, RootContext for the, hum, root context, and DN for the whole thing.
Ok, enough insanity ;)
I would like to thanks all the people who successfully drove us mad with
all those names ;)
Emmanuel
