Ok, thanks Mark,
I have remove dthe comment.
On 4/16/07, Mark Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have a shiny new Authenticator implementation running (mostly, I
think) and came across a comment that I think should be changed:
--- AbstractAuthenticator.java 2007-02-21 16:25:53.000000000 -0500
+++ AbstractAuthenticator.java.new 2007-04-16 00:40:12.000000000-0400
@@ -144,13 +144,14 @@
/**
* Returns a new [EMAIL PROTECTED] LdapPrincipal} instance whose value is
the
specified
* <tt>name</tt>.
- *
+ *
+ * This method is available for custom Authenticator
implementations.
+ *
* @param name the distinguished name of the X.500 principal
* @param authenticationLeve
* @return the principal for the <tt>name</tt>
* @throws NamingException if there is a problem parsing
<tt>name</tt>
*/
- // does not seem to be used
protected static LdapPrincipal createLdapPrincipal( String name,
AuthenticationLevel authenticationLeve )
throws NamingException
{
I could not create a custom Authenticator without createLdapPrincipal().
Of course, unless I can. :-) (then please show me how)
Cheers.
--
http://www.ScheduleWorld.com/
Free Google Calendar synchronization with Outlook, Evolution,
cell phones, BlackBerry, PalmOS, Exchange, Mozilla, Thunderbird,
Pocket PC/Windows Mobile. Also sync tasks, notes and contacts!
WebDAV, vfreebusy, RSS, LDAP, iCalendar, iTIP, iMIP support.
--
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
