Bastiaan Bakker a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 16:07 +0200, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Alex Karasulu a écrit :
I wish I could do that but continuum is a mess at this point. I could
not
get it to do anything properly but that may have just been me. Perhaps
if it improves I'd be willing to give it another try.
I also had it 'working' last month, but this was really messy. Not
really stable, and not really production ready at this point.
Emmanuel
Would that be continuum 1.0.3 or 1.1-alpha?
1.0.3.
According to the continuum
folks 1.1-alpha should be a lot better than 1.0.3, both feature and
stability wise.
I hope so ! 1.0.3 was not totally buggy, but I juts found it complex,
and difficult to manage if you have some problems with the database. Ok,
it was a month ago, so it's a little bit old ...
I'm trying out continuum for our dev group, so I am interested in both
positive and negative experiences. So far, a rebuild of continuum with
continuum was very easy: just enter to the URL of the parent POM and let
it build.
I'll give apacheds a try on 1.1-alpha if you haven't done so already.
That would be appreciated a lot ! We sadly don't have a lot of time to
spend on such experiment, so if you can just give it a try and give us a
feedback, it will be welcomed !
Cheers,
Bastiaan
Emmanuel
