On 5/18/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Enrique Rodriguez a écrit : > On 5/18/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 5/18/07, Enrique Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > ... >> > PIDs must have gone in at least 1.5 years ago, when we did the first >> > prototype with OSGi. They are not new. In fact, that's part of the >> > reason the fqpn needed updating. >> >> I thought you had that in a branch. I did not know all this OSGi >> experimentation >> was going on in the trunk code outside of isolated modules like those >> under >> the >> osgi subdirectory.
Is it a big deal ? A soon as we keep a track of what those PID are good
for (means : doco), I think we are safe with keeping them in the code, no ?
Yes this is not a big deal. My primary reason for asking was to see if there was more to this which I could not tell from a cursory view. It's fine keeping them in the code but I would like to organize things a bit better when I get a chance. Alex
