Thanks for you reply. On 5/21/07, Stefan Zoerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Emmanuel! Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Now, here are the questions : > 1) If the requested Attribute is described in a disabled schema, what > should we do ? During some thinking and testing w.r.t. to your questions, I faced the following: Is it possible to have an entry, which uses an attribute types of a disabled schema? I assume yes.
Me too. Searching for *all* entries using a disabled schema is obviously an expensive operation. The semantic of Disabled should be something like : "you can read entries which use the disabled AT and OC, but you cannot add such disabled objects". <snip/>Please note, that this is possible, although the schema is used by an
entry. Q: Is this intended?
I guess so. Alex ? Ersin ? <snip/>
This is obviously related to DIRSERVER-936. My question: How to handle disabling a schema, if there are still entries which use it? I guess it is a very expense operation to check this condition ... Or is it still implemented, but the way I disabled the schema was illegal?
Well, my opinion is that when a schema is disabled, you can anymore create an object using one of its AT or OC, and you can't modify an existing entry to use the disabled AT and OC. wdyt ? -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
