Oh - One more thing.
After I delete the entry
cn=ecore, ou=schema,
I get the exception,
but LS still removes the
entry from the tree.
Then when I refresh, it pops
back in.
Cheers,
- Ole
Ole Ersoy (JIRA) wrote:
Schema Entry Deletes Must be Sequenced
--------------------------------------
Key: DIRSTUDIO-109
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-109
Project: Directory LDAP Studio
Issue Type: Bug
Components: ldapstudio-browser
Affects Versions: 0.7.0
Environment: FC6
Reporter: Ole Ersoy
Priority: Minor
Actually this is probably more of a new feature than a bug...
I created a
schema entry
like this:
ou=attributeTypes,cn=ecore, ou=schema
ou=syntaxes, cn=ecore, ou=schema
I have one attributeType entry
that depends on a syntax entry,
under
ou=syntaxes, cn=ecore, ou=schema
When I select the entry
cn=ecore, ou=schema
and do a delete I get this:
Error while deleting entry
[LDAP: error code 53 - failed to delete entry
m-oid=1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.4.98100505.1019857.4101539.5010251.6529753.1101991.0529799.955495751,ou=syntaxes,cn=ecore,ou=schema:
The syntax with OID
1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.4.98100505.1019857.4101539.5010251.6529753.1101991.0529799.955495751
cannot be deleted until all entities using this syntax have also been deleted.
The following dependees exist:
[1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.4.98515110.5310256.9575156.5495150.9981025.4855551.2981009.98495457.4101]]
[LDAP: error code 53 - failed to delete entry
m-oid=1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.4.98100505.1019857.4101539.5010251.6529753.1101991.0529799.955495751,ou=syntaxes,cn=ecore,ou=schema:
The syntax with OID
1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.4.98100505.1019857.4101539.5010251.6529753.1101991.0529799.955495751
cannot be deleted until all entities using this syntax have also been deleted.
The following dependees exist:
[1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.4.98515110.5310256.9575156.5495150.9981025.4855551.2981009.98495457.4101]]
If I delete the entries in this sequence manually everything is fine:
ou=attributeTypes,cn=ecore, ou=schema
ou=syntaxes, cn=ecore, ou=schema
cn=ecore, ou=schema
So if the delete function has the intelligence
to understand that it has to delete the syntaxes
before it can delete attributeTypes, that would be cool.
Cheers,
- Ole
