On 6/5/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- I suggest that the Ldap configuration remains as simple as possible, and as close as it was previously. We will discuss further about which will be the next configuration scheme, considering that a lot of work have been done related to this part of the server. Not only your work, but also the guys working on LdapStudio (and the ServerConfiguration editor plugin), but also the current discussion about storing the configuration in the DIT. We didn't want to include this new configuration before the SASL dust has settled, this is why we asked for a delay before including it.
We had two threads, called "[SASL] SASL configuration" and "[SASL] SASL configuration, part 2." I ask, respectfully, that you re-read those threads. In both threads we discuss changes to the Ldap configuration, such that there would be an LdapConfiguration bean under the StartupConfiguration bean. In fact, in the lead message of "[SASL] SASL configuration" I ask about moving maxSizeLimit and maxTimeLimit to StartupConfiguration. I don't think there should have been any surprise here. Moreover, during the review of the SASL branch there were positive comments made about the new protocol configuration. I really tried to be open, and on the public mailing list, to discuss my changes before I made them. In end result of these threads still appears to me to be positive concensus for an LdapConfiguration bean. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/directory-dev/200703.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/directory-dev/200703.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enrique
