Hey T, The question is not where DHCP will go. It's definitely slated for inclusion in ApacheDS to fullfil the Realm Controller concepts. So, this is not a matter of whether or not it deserves to be here at Directory. I don't want to turn this into that kind of discussion. This is just a matter of maturity and documentation I think.
IMO MINA should not be the place to host all protocols. It can for some time host protocols specific projects that do not have critical community mass (like Asynchweb) until they blossom. But to try to build MINA out to be a massive TLP in this way is a big mistake and will result in the same issues that have confronted Jakarta. Keeping the TLP lean and mean will keep it functional. I'd love tho to see protocol analyzers and other protocol development tooling sub-projects start at MINA tho. Alex On 6/11/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/10/07, Stefan Seelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [X] +1 : Let's sandbox it MINA project team might be interested in maintaining the codec / message class part of the sand-boxed protocol providers in the future. We are still busy improving MINA itself, so it will not happen right now, but I believe we will implement many standard protocols on top of MINA and provide them as MINA protocol codecs. Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
