Alex Karasulu wrote:
Mark keep in mind that you can use command line tools instead of a GUI
to set the configuration of the server when the configuration is in the DIT.

Furthermore you can just load an LDIF instead of using a server.xml to
setup the initial configuration of the server.  So you get the best of both
worlds: a flat configuration file and remote configuration capabilities.

However we want to make sure we make the configuration interfaces as
easy to use as they were with the server.xml but behind the scenes
different mechanisms will be utilized.  All in all it should be much more
plyable.

Ok. One more email from me and I will stop being a stick in the mud :-)

From what I understand of the command line tools, I assume you are speaking of 'load LDIF into server'?

Wrt LDIF - I am sure that the sample ldif file with embedded examples would be more confusing to me, and a GUI/LDAP editor is not going to make this any better. I agree with Norval:

<quote>
Frankly I think XML is a much richer medium to express complex configuration settings as beans, then an LDAP schema which is better suited to modelling much simpler abstractions.
</quote>

<b> +1 </b>

The existing configuration process works. Let's leave it at that and if folks want to take the time to build a GUI/alternate config format then please consider creating it as an alternate config/maintenance option. (Even if it was the primary/default option).

Cheers.

--
http://www.ScheduleWorld.com/
Free Google Calendar synchronization with Outlook, Evolution,
cell phones, BlackBerry, PalmOS, Exchange, Mozilla, Thunderbird,
Pocket PC/Windows Mobile. Also sync tasks, notes and contacts!
WebDAV, vfreebusy, RSS, LDAP, iCalendar, iTIP, iMIP support.

Reply via email to