Hi List-Members,
the following mail was first sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I
think this is more a developer issue. Maybe someone can throw an eye on
it maybe help me out to find a solution?
TIA
Markus
- - - - -
Hi list-users,
I do have problem with my content management system working with
apacheds on a windows 2003 server installation.
My content management system (coremmedia 2005) tries to identify each
user by ldap request against apacheds 1.5.x ldap server.
What I found out is, that the ldap request against an apacheds-1.5.x on
a windows 2003 server system isnt successful, while the same request
against a centos 4.3 or fedora 7 apacheds-1.5.x installation is successful.
How did I find that out? Well, I configured my CMS to connect against
apacheds-1.5.x on a windows 2003 server, where apacheds logs are in
debug mode. Then I tried to load CMS startpage, which is not successful.
Then I did the same with CMS connected against apacheds-1.5.x running on
centos 4.3 with logfiles in debug mode. Now the startpage was loaded.
I then searched thru the logfiles and found out the following:
- the search request from CMS is always the following:
[19:48:34] DEBUG [org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.codec.TwixDecoder] -
Decoded LdapMessage : LdapMessage
message Id : 2
Search Request
Base Object : 'cn=users,cn=cms,dc=APPLICATIONS,dc=DOUGLASHOLDING'
Scope : whole subtree
Deref Aliases : deref Always
Size Limit : no limit
Time Limit : no limit
Types Only : false
Filter : '(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(uid=Jeder))'
Attributes : uid, mail, sn, cn, givenname, objectClass
Control
Control type : '2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.2'
Criticality : 'false'
[19:48:34] DEBUG
[org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.codec.TwixTransformer] - Transforming
LdapMessage <2, SEARCH_REQUEST> from Twix to Snickers.
[19:48:34] DEBUG
[org.apache.directory.server.ldap.support.SearchHandler] - Message
received: SearchRequest
baseDn : 'cn=users,cn=cms,dc=APPLICATIONS,dc=DOUGLASHOLDING'
filter : '(& (objectClass=inetOrgPerson) (uid=Jeder) ) '
scope : whole subtree
typesOnly : false
no limit
Time Limit : no limit
Deref Aliases : deref Always
attributes : 'uid', 'mail', 'sn', 'cn', 'givenname', 'objectClass'
- the search result is the same on both systems:
[19:48:34] DEBUG
[org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.codec.TwixTransformer] - Transformed
message : LdapMessage
message Id : 2
Search Result Entry
Object Name :
'0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=jeder,2.5.4.3=users,0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.25=verwaltung,0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.25=douglasholding'
Attributes
Attributes
Attribute id : 'uid', Values : ['Jeder']
Attribute id : 'sn', Values : ['Jeder']
Attribute id : 'cn', Values : ['Jeder']
Attribute id : 'objectClass', Values :
['organizationalPerson', 'person', 'inetOrgPerson', 'top']
[19:48:34] DEBUG [org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.codec.TwixEncoder] -
Encoding this LdapMessage : LdapMessage
message Id : 2
Search Result Entry
Object Name :
'0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=jeder,2.5.4.3=users,0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.25=verwaltung,0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.25=douglasholding'
Attributes
Attributes
Attribute id : 'uid', Values : ['Jeder']
Attribute id : 'sn', Values : ['Jeder']
Attribute id : 'cn', Values : ['Jeder']
Attribute id : 'objectClass', Values :
['organizationalPerson', 'person', 'inetOrgPerson', 'top']
But the next line in debug log which contains the Encoded PDU differs
from windows 2003 server to centos43.
The windows 2003 encoded PDU looks like this:
[19:48:34] DEBUG [org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.codec.TwixEncoder] -
Encoded PDU : 0x30 0x81 0xAD 0x02 0x01 0x02 0x64 0x81 0xA7 0x04 0x32
0x75 0x69 0x64 0x3D 0x4A 0x65 0x64 0x65 0x72 0x2C 0x63 0x6E 0x3D 0x75
0x73 0x65 0x72 0x
73 0x2C 0x64 0x63 0x3D 0x56 0x45 0x52 0x57 0x41 0x4C 0x54 0x55 0x4E 0x47
0x2C 0x64 0x63 0x3D 0x44 0x4F 0x55 0x47 0x4C 0x41 0x53 0x48 0x4F 0x4C
0x44 0x49 0x4E 0x47 0x30 0x71 0x30 0x0E 0x04 0x03 0x75 0x69 0x64 0x31
0x07 0x04 0x05
0x4A 0x65 0x64 0x65 0x72 0x30 0x0D 0x04 0x02 0x73 0x6E 0x31 0x07 0x04
0x05 0x4A 0x65 0x64 0x65 0x72 0x30 0x0D 0x04 0x02 0x63 0x6E 0x31 0x07
0x04 0x05 0x4A 0x65 0x64 0x65 0x72 0x30 0x41 0x04 0x0B 0x6F 0x62 0x6A
0x65 0x63 0x74 0x4
3 0x6C 0x61 0x73 0x73 0x31 0x32 0x04 0x14 0x6F 0x72 0x67 0x61 0x6E 0x69
0x7A 0x61 0x74 0x69 0x6F 0x6E 0x61 0x6C 0x50 0x65 0x72 0x73 0x6F 0x6E
0x04 0x06 0x70 0x65 0x72 0x73 0x6F 0x6E 0x04 0x0D 0x69 0x6E 0x65 0x74
0x4F 0x72 0x67 0
x50 0x65 0x72 0x73 0x6F 0x6E 0x04 0x03 0x74 0x6F 0x70
The centos43 encoded PDU looks like this:
[10:26:02] DEBUG [org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.codec.TwixEncoder] -
Encoded PDU : 0x30 0x81 0xB0 0x02 0x01 0x02 0x64 0x81 0xAA 0x04 0x35
0x75 0x69 0x64 0x3D 0x4A 0x65 0x64 0x65 0x72 0x2C 0x20 0x63 0x6E 0x3D
0x75 0x73 0x65 0x
72 0x73 0x2C 0x20 0x64 0x63 0x3D 0x56 0x45 0x52 0x57 0x41 0x4C 0x54 0x55
0x4E 0x47 0x2C 0x20 0x64 0x63 0x3D 0x44 0x4F 0x55 0x47 0x4C 0x41 0x53
0x48 0x4F 0x4C 0x44 0x49 0x4E 0x47 0x30 0x71 0x30 0x0D 0x04 0x02 0x73
0x6E 0x31 0x07
0x04 0x05 0x4A 0x65 0x64 0x65 0x72 0x30 0x41 0x04 0x0B 0x6F 0x62 0x6A
0x65 0x63 0x74 0x43 0x6C 0x61 0x73 0x73 0x31 0x32 0x04 0x06 0x70 0x65
0x72 0x73 0x6F 0x6E 0x04 0x14 0x6F 0x72 0x67 0x61 0x6E 0x69 0x7A 0x61
0x74 0x69 0x6F 0x6
E 0x61 0x6C 0x50 0x65 0x72 0x73 0x6F 0x6E 0x04 0x0D 0x69 0x6E 0x65 0x74
0x4F 0x72 0x67 0x50 0x65 0x72 0x73 0x6F 0x6E 0x04 0x03 0x74 0x6F 0x70
0x30 0x0D 0x04 0x02 0x63 0x6E 0x31 0x07 0x04 0x05 0x4A 0x65 0x64 0x65
0x72 0x30 0x0E 0
x04 0x03 0x75 0x69 0x64 0x31 0x07 0x04 0x05 0x4A 0x65 0x64 0x65 0x72
Putting this two PDU strings in a small program that converts that hex
strings to readable char string delivers the following:
Windows 2003 Server:
0°dª5uid=Jeder, cn=users, dc=VERWALTUNG,
dc=DOUGLASHOLDING0q0
sn1Jeder0A objectClass12personorganizationalPerson
inetOrgPersontop0 cn1Jeder0uid1Jeder
CentOs 4.3:
0d§2uid=Jeder,cn=users,dc=VERWALTUNG,dc=DOUGLASHOLDING0q0uid1Jeder0
sn1Jeder0
cn1Jeder0A objectClass12organizationalPersonperson
inetOrgPersontop
My question is: what makes the difference? Where is the mistake? Where
is my mistake? What can I do? Is it a bug?
Any tips and hints are really appreciated. If neccessary, I can send
server.xml and logfiles from both servers, or whatever is needed.
Thanks in advance,
Markus
