yes, and we will move on this week ! Thanks Julien.
PS : if you are available this week, may I interrupt you if we have some problem ? On 8/14/07, Julien Vermillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The API impact is minimal, just generics in some places and as Alex > said it'll remove the concurrency back-port dependency. > > If you already depend on Java 1.5 there is no good reason for stick to > 1.0.X :) > > Julien > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:05:34 +0200 > "Emmanuel Lecharny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Let's try ! It should not be complicated to switch to 1.1.2. > > > > On 8/14/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 8/14/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Guys I think we should use MINA 1.1.2 in the trunk which is a jdk > > > > 5 port of MINA 1.0 which > > > > should remove the extra dependency on the concurrent jar and > > > > possibly result in some > > > > performance improvements. > > > > > > > > WDYT? Trustin could you chime in here with some advice? > > > > > > It's a good idea! :) > > > > > > Trustin > > > -- > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit > > > -- > > > http://gleamynode.net/ > > > -- > > > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6 > > > > > > > > -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
