Hey E! Thanks for this.
On 8/15/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I have done my homeworks and browsed JIRA to harvest the bugs we still > have. The bad news is that we have a lot of them, the good news is > that we only have 2 blockrs and 1 criticals remaining. Here they are : I'll start looking at these blocker and critical bugs. 1.5.1 issues : > ------------ > 2 blockers > 4 criticals > 48 majors > 10 minors > 1 trivial > > Only 30 are bugs. > > _but_ since 1.5.0, > 63 fixed issues, out of it : > 6 were blockers, > 4 were criticals, > 33 were majors > 18 were minors > and 3 were trivials > > Remaining blockers : > -------------------- > * [DIRSERVER-832] - Added Attributes are all case sensitive > > This issue's title is deceptive... The pb is much wider than simply > case sensitivity. I'm not sure it can be fixed in 1.5.1, if we are to > realease before the end of august. I would suggest a postpone. > > * [DIRSERVER-951] - Negated filter on indexed attribute doesn't find > entries without attribute > Not an easy one, but we can expect to fix it for 1.5.1. Anyone ? > > Remaining criticals : > --------------------- > Out of 4 criticals, we have only 1 bug, otherwise there are 2 tasks > and one improvement. > > * [DIRSERVER-928] - Comparator may fail > This is a class which is instanciated 25 times in the code, when we > need a comparator for a specific Attribute. I think we should use a > specific comparator instead of this generic one, because its logic is > broken : if none of the objects implement Comparable, then it ends > with a o1.hashCode() - o2.hashCode(). The pb is that it's not because > o1.hashCode() == o2.hashCode() that both objects are equals... > > Remaining majors : > ------------------ > 23 of those guys, if we consider only the bugs. I will create a > commented list tomorrow, but the best would be to check on JIRA. Will do. Putting on the Conan music now to slay the bugs: http://safehaus.org/~akarasulu/conan.mp3 :-D Alex
