Hi, we have discussed those requirements with pam yesturday, and we have found some cases where it can kills. For instance, we have AT which are userApplications and inheit from a dsaOperation (I don't remember which one). If we are to respect the RFC, then we will have big problems with such AT.
Pam, do you remember the ATs we discussed about yesturday ? On 8/25/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah Pierre I don't think we're observing these. Let's put this into JIRA. > Schedule it for 1.5.1 too - if E decides to push it back to 1.5.2 we'll do > that. Shoot for the stars and maybe we can get to the moon. > > Alex > > > On 8/24/07, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Dev, > > > > As I'm working on the SchemaChecker for the Schema Editor Plugin for > Apache Directory Studio, i'm reading the corresponding RFCs. > > > > I was wondering if Apache DS implements the recommendations of theses > RFCs. > > > > From RFC 4512, about attribute types: > > > > > An attribute type (a subtype) may derive from a more generic > > > > > > > > > attribute type (a direct supertype). The following restrictions > > > apply to subtyping: > > > > > > - a subtype must have the same usage as its direct supertype, > > > - a subtype's syntax must be the same, or a refinement of, its > > > > > > > > > supertype's syntax, and > > > - a subtype must be collective [ > > > RFC3671 > > > ] if its supertype is > > > collective. > > > > > > > Are these checks done by the Schema Checker ? > > > > If not, I'll create a Jira for it. > > > > Thanks, > > > > P-A > > > > -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
