Excellent news and thanks for the summary. I have more comments to make however life is catching up with me at the moment. Let me get back to this email in a little bit.
Regards, Alex On 9/21/07, Martin Alderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > For my fairly limited use mitosis is performing very well. > > I've slacked off a bit over the last few weeks but will try to get back > onto it soon. > > For stable use there is still that critical issue where a change on the > same entry on multiple servers will lead to a permanently inconsistent > state. I'll make that my priority soon. > > I also recently came across a minor timeout issue which I think is a > problem in MINA. I'll investigate that more soon too. > > Aside from that there are niggling issues like replication of schema > changes. Once these issues have been worked out I think we have a > stable replication system. > > There are some features that I guess we really need to get in for it to > actually be useful for the majority of users though. The main things > that come to mind are selective replication, encryption, schedules and > removing the dependency on Derby. > > I know you and Ersin are thinking about possible design changes although > to me those can be done incrementally later on as required. I doubt > that I will be a driving force behind these changes but am willing to > help. > > Martin > > > Alex Karasulu wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > > Was just curious what you think about the state of Mitosis. Could you > give > > us an update of > > how it's performing for you as well as the additional work you think > needs > > to be done on it? > > > > I want to start looking at making it production stable for a 2.0 final > > release down the line > > (early 2008). > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > >
