Yes you're absolutely right.  Thanks for helping me see the true path.
Let's refactor it in.
Now who will do this when is an issue as always.  I'll see if I can spare
cycles for it but I
need help: drowning over here.

Alex

On 9/21/07, Ersin Er <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What I am sure is that this feature is a MUST and it's urgent. The things
> you proposed in the thread "Specifying application level subtrees?" even
> depend on this feature. Without virtual attributes, no dynamic stuff makes
> sense. So I suggest starting working on this immediately.
>
> On 9/21/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Yes we must start thinking about this heavily but the question remains:
> > When?
> >
> > Do we get a 2.0 out with what features we can fit into the present
> > architecture first
> > then work on these features in the next experimental branch?
> >
> > IMO 1.0 is just done. 1.5.x is so much better in every respect.  Our
> > users deserve 2.0
> > ASAP.  But we must balance this with stuffing in the right features into
> > what exists.
> > I want 2.0.x to have a good half life.  We need to decide what to do.
> > Or we can just
> > start working on a redesign concurrently in some branch.
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > On 9/21/07, Ersin Er <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > > If we had Virtual Attributes, there would not be need for special
> > > handling such stuff.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1067
> > >
> > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Attributes+on+Demand
> > >
> > > I know it's not a trivial task but it's a must to solve many problems
> > > we have.
> > >
> > > On 9/21/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This should be translated within the interceptor layer (schema
> > > > service) into (objectClass=*).
> > > >
> > > > Or if in the future we allow TRUE/FALSE nodes in the filter AST then
> > > > it can be replaced by a TRUE
> > > > node which returns the entire set of entries at the specified scope.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ersin Er
> > > http://www.ersin-er.name
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ersin Er
> http://www.ersin-er.name
>

Reply via email to