We need a Release Schedule/Roadmap for 2.0 right now. On 9/25/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I didn't say that we should not experiment in branch, but that we > should not merge the branch in 2.0, otherwise we will have too many > configuration change. > > When 2.0 will be out, we may then merge the branch with trunk, or > discard the branch. > > Branching to experiment this new configuration is like if we > anticipate the 2.5 trunk, and I have nothing againt that. > > On 9/25/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 9/25/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For those reasons, I would say : keep 2.0 conf as is, and do > > > experimentations in a branch. > > > > So we're not going to be too free to experiment from now on in 1.5branch? > > This sort of > > breaks with our general policy on branches yet it's appealing in many > other > > ways. It's > > just a matter of trade offs. It's more important in this case for us to > > just make a decision. > > > > Either option is fine with me since both choices take relatively the > same > > time and energy. > > I started this thread to see what people are thinking about it and it > sounds > > as though there > > is a split. Perhaps we just need a vote and go with it. > > > > Alex > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com >
-- Ersin Er http://www.ersin-er.name
