I voted for small changes, but as we won't be able to get a 2.0 out for december anyway, I would prefer have some major refactoring right now. We are suffering from some major drawbacks we should get rid of.
You bought my vote ! +1 On 9/29/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We officially closed this vote at 2pm EST. > > Here are the votes for applying large scale changes: > > Chris Custine > Alex Karasulu > Stefan Zoerner > David Jencks (non-binding) > > Although Emmanuel voted for not having large scale changes I think he > changed his mind at some > point in other threads seeing how hard it would be to deliver the roadmap > for 2.0 by December. > However instead of putting words in your mouth Emmanuel I'll just count you > as opposed to large > changes. > > This was a tough vote. I myself was undecided for a while. We're trying > to get stable products out > with the features our users need of them and that's a great thing. However > sometimes the size and > scope just don't give us the ability to pull of the task in the time > alloted. Who said it's easy to build > an LDAP server and since we're the first Java LDAP server that makes it even > harder. > > Let's do it right and shoot for a release before Apache Conference Europe > next year. Then we're have > something big to talk about. > > This vote does not solve our problems though. We still have to define the > roadmap and agree to it > and find someone to keep us honest making sure that we make our dates. So > this is just a realization > and not the solution to our problems. > > Personally I'm pretty excited because now we have some juicy problems to > confront and no more excuses > to put them off since we now have the freedom to aggressively confront > them.. > > Let's do it!!! > > Alex > > > -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
