I replied to alex only ... Alex, I don't know if it's you or your mailer, but just in case, no need to add me on the recipient, I have subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;)
On 9/29/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > 1) We currently have a live trunk, which will be used to release a > > > 1.5.2 release sooner or later (a bug fix release). > > > > Emmanuel this is slighly incorrect perhaps in terminology according to our > > release scheme and > > policy which you had a hand in establishing. > > yes, I'm a little bit incorrect. I meant : bug fix + new features. > > > Emmanuel what I find you always doing is mixing concepts. You mix features > > and bug fix releases. > > I feel like you're mixing some things perhaps we did not have enough > > discussion. Let me give you an > > example: a while back you worked on the 1.0 branch where you changed > > something freely without it > > being needed to fix a bug. As a result you changed the classes serialized > > into the partition entries and > > this made it so 1.0.1 partitions were not compatible with 1.0.2 partitions. > > I'm pointing this out because > > now you're doing just the opposite with experimental releases. Here we > > should have the freedom to > > change as much as we like so don't hold back. This is the time to be > > liberal not after the final major > > release in bug fix branches. > > Don't worry. I sometime confusing a few things, due to some language gap, too. > > > > We have to find a > > > way to merge changes from the trunk to the branch _or_ from the branch > > > to the trunk without jeopardize the trunk > > > > Oh certainly I agree. > > I think it's what I meant with my previous sentence, even if it was not clear. > > <snip/> > > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
