Hi, do you mean 'options', ad defined by the RFC ? Language tags (ie cn;lang-fr) are named options in RFC. You have two kinds of options : standard and extended (prefixed by x-).
We can think about the impact of implementing them in term of support in the alue classes. Let's dig the idea further ... On 10/2/07, Ersin Er <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think that there is such a draft. But Contexts seem to be mostly an > implementation matter. > > > On 10/2/07, Alex Karasulu < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there RFC material on Contexts for LDAP? I thought contexts were an > X.500 concept that never > > made it to LDAP. Essentially tags are a workaround to provide similar > capabilities. However is there > > a contexts for LDAP RFC I missed? > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/2/07, Ersin Er < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We have a feature listed in the 2.0 roadmap and is currently being > implemented by Emmanuel. It's the "Value and ServerEntry" item. What I want > to ask is that as we are encapsulating attribute values with a Value class > now, is it possible to support Contexts during this effort? You know there > are Language Tags in LDAP and we do not support them. I really do not like > the idea of supporting only Language Tags instead of the more general one, > Contexts. So if we'll support this feature it should be Contexts, not only > Language Tags. > > > > > > Any comments on the possibility of this addition? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -- > > > Ersin Er > > > http://www.ersin-er.name > > > > > > > > -- > Ersin Er > http://www.ersin-er.name -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
