No worries. Alex
On 10/5/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Forget about my idea, it was just a try. I should have tested it > before suggesting we can do it. > > Sorry for the noise, buddies :) > > On 10/5/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think this may be easier to do once we start cleaning up from the > bigbang. > > I > > have some ideas on how to break up the core a bit to be able to avoid > these > > maven module cyclic dependencies. > > > > > > Alex > > > > On 10/5/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have tried to create this new project, but we have a cycle > > > dependency problem, so I reverted (locally). > > > > > > At the end, I think we should simply start from the ground a new JNDI > > > layer, and when it's ready, inject it as the interface to the server. > > > Baby steps again ... > > > > > > > > > On 10/5/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yep that's what I thought we should do. First the decoupling and > for > > some > > > > time the provider may still reside > > > > in the core until we swap branches because I don't want to have > merges > > cause > > > > problems with large scale svn folder > > > > moves. > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/5/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Ok, so I think we can just create this project, and move the JNDI > code > > > > > for it without any problem. It should keep the server working, but > > > > > will help later. > > > > > > > > > > I will give it a try. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Ersin ! > > > > > > > > > > PS: > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxPMGT/JNDI+removing > > > > > > > > > > On 10/5/07, Ersin Er <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > As far as I know that's what we intend to do. The server will > itself > > be > > > > > > manageable without the JNDI layer and the JNDI layer will just > be an > > > > adaptor > > > > > > to control the server for those who prefer to interact with > JNDI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/5/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hu guys, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to have a > specific > > > > > > > apacheds-jndi sub-project, instead of having this jndi layer > > inside > > > > > > > apacheds-core ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wdyt ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Cordialement, > > > > > > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > > > > > > www.iktek.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Ersin Er > > > > > > http://www.ersin-er.name > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Cordialement, > > > > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > > > > www.iktek.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Cordialement, > > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > > www.iktek.com > > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com >
