>From my POV it would be nice, if this can be done as well for the MANIFEST.MF. I'd like to get rid of adapting versions of dependencies in the Bundle-Classpath. I could imagine having a task in a maven-studio-plugin writing the MANIFEST.MF in the same manor as done for the lib directory. The configuration for the MANIFEST.MF will stay in pom.xml where we can also reference to dependencies.
WDYT? Felix Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot schrieb: > Ok, then it's not an issue... :) > > We need to run "$ ant resolve" to get the dependencies right now, so > it's not really a problem. As long as it is in the documentation on > how to build the trunk, then I think it's ok. > > Thanks, > P-A > > On 10/22/07, *Felix Knecht* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot schrieb: > > Ok, thanks Felix. > > > > I'm also realizing there could be another problem with the jar > > dependencies. > > I know that usualy (that's what is done in ApacheDS projects) jar > > dependencies declared in Maven are linked in Eclipse using the > M2_REPO > > location (basically '~/.m2/repository') in the classpath > properties of > > a project. > > > > Here (in Studio), we really need the dependencies to be copied > in the > > a 'lib' folder because: > > - they need to be bundled in the jar of the plugin to work > > - Eclipse needs them when bundling the plugin to launch it for > testing > > and debugging (same situation as the MANIFEST.MF file). > > > > Do you think this is possible to have such a behavior for > dependencies > > in Maven (I'm really not a Maven expert... :'( ) ? > > Yes, this can be done - but you would need to run once maven to have > them there. This could be done havind a specific profile. After a new > svn checkout of a project you'll need to run e.g. > $ mvn install -Pprepare-for-eclipse to have all the needed jar files > copied to ${module}/lib. > > Felix > >
